Fundamentus / Status Invest vs apicvm CVM Filings API
Fundamentus Status Invest vs apicvm comparisons should separate retail fundamentals websites from a filings HTTP API. Fundamentus and Status Invest help humans screen Brazilian equities in a browser. apicvm exposes CVM documents for code and agents. Complementary — not a takeover of those sites.
Side-by-side
| Capability | Fundamentus / Status Invest | apicvm |
|---|---|---|
| Browser screeners / ratios UX | Yes | No |
| Stable HTTP document UUIDs for DFP/ITR/FRE | Not the product | Yes |
| Bearer-auth integration in your backend | Scraping is fragile | Yes |
| Page-level extraction callbacks | No | Yes (Pro) |
| Designed for AI agent tool calls | No | Yes |
Developer shape
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $APICVM_KEY" \
"$APICVM_URL/v1/documents?ticker=MGLU3&type=DFP&year=2024&perPage=20"Use retail sites for discovery; switch to apicvm when you need reproducible files. Scraping those sites is brittle — see Scraping CVM portal vs API.
When apicvm is the better fit
- Pipelines, agents, and internal APIs
- Audit trails that store document IDs
- FRE section pulls with
namefilters
When retail sites are the better fit
- Quick human screens without engineering
- Educational browsing of multiples
- Teams that will not call an HTTP API
Current limitations
- apicvm is not a drop-in "Fundamentus API"
- We do not mirror every indicator those sites show
- Empty document lists mean corpus gaps
Next steps
Ready to integrate?
Get an API key and start querying Brazilian CVM filings programmatically.